False Narratives: The sadistic use of Confirmation Bias and Cognitive Dissonance by the British Establishment to silence dissent and persecute the people!

Fourth Blog Piece for S4J 

Competing narratives and confirmation bias.

Power and powerlessness!

In this blog post for Science for Justice (NL) I am using mainly two psychological theories, confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance to explain why ordinary people have been fooled into believing the lies about me coming from the British state.  I am arguing that it is a deliberate use of these psychological phenomena to manipulate people:  the use of the culturally developed biases (inculcated by States) of ordinary people, to turn people against dissenters and victimize innocent people, sadistically. I am arguing that the British state uses these tactics to control, oppress, interrupt or silence dissent.  In my case, and many other cases, they have used these strategies to torture me. They are very effective!

I believe the ideas here can be extrapolated to many miscarriages of justice where people believe it is ‘accidental’ or 'incompetence'; I am arguing it is deliberate manipulation and sadism! The manipulation of narratives and ideas to persecute innocent people.

 The establishment (police; judiciary; politicians; powerful people; lazy people; immoral people) are doing it intentionally.  They (the establishment) are using courts, the police, other institutions and societal procedures to do this; and colluding with their allies also.  These institutions at the heart of a democratic society are, apparently, meant to support a just and fair society; where ‘mistakes’, malfeasance or downright criminal and sadistic behaviour, can be investigated objectively and justice restored for innocent people. Fair and just are fundamental blocks of a functioning democracy. The UK is not functioning as a democracy.

I hope it is clear, that I am asserting none of the clear and public, current patterns of oppression towards the British people are because of ‘mistakes’.  ‘Just doing my job’ was the excuse given during Nazi Germany when millions of Jews were gassed to death.

At my most generous you could assert ‘weaponised incompetence’, in some instances, but this is only a distraction.  Bureaucrats, state actors and institutions are being encouraged to be sadistic to British people and to see them as ‘the problem to be silenced’.

Visual diagrams of how narratives interact with the truth.

I want to make this blog post as short and concise as possible, so that the confusion you may have felt, may feel, after reading so much of what I have written, disappears and becomes crystal clear, in the way it is in my head.  It is concise in my head because I have been living and watching it unfold since 2020.  I have also seen the utter confusion on the faces of good, kind and intelligent people who did not have the patience and the intellectual awareness needed to be aware of:

Missing Information.

I think the most important aspect of humanity is that we are missing information and know far less than we think we know because our monkey brains do this for survival.

There are two types of important missing information:

1. The missing information which comes from my story being completely unique, difficult for outsiders to understand, given it spans multiples cultures; and therefore, difficult to comprehend.  It is the perfect situation for: Confirmation Bias.

2. Missing official information, which confirms much of what I say.  Refused by people, judges, immigration in Switzerland; and refused by the IPT court and Police Scotland in the UK.  I will give a list of documents and information at the bottom of this post which are required to complete my analysis of my situation.  I do not expect the evidence to be released and if it is, it will be redacted.  A lot of what is written is lies in any case but refusing to release the information (which is contradicted in order pieces of official information) is evidence of a cover up.

   
   

Let’s start with the missing information (Number 1 above) which started this insane journey. The information which you do not have: How a white, mature, professional and highly educated British woman experiences asylum camps in Switzerland; and tries to explain to exceptionally ignorant westerners what my life is/was like outside the UK, in order to enlighten them.  (To summarise: it is outwith the frames of reference of most people.)

My story has to be understood from the perspective of ‘your consciousness’ and your ‘unknown unknowns’ (Donal Rumsfeld - explained further down).  Also, if you have ever spoken to a child and realised that they know very little due to their limited experiences, try to imagine this is you, talking to multiple people (with childlike understanding), about multiple cultures and who are absolutely unaware that they have no idea about what you are talking about, due to their non-existence knowledge or experience of what you are talking about! 

It's like encouraging a child to swear knowing they do not know what it means but knowing they are getting a reaction of hilarity from the adults - so they keep doing it! Not knowing it will harm them or other people if said in the wrong company!

So, back to missing information.

Missing information is the information which you believe you have or believe you know, but are unaware of the fact that this is your confirmation bias.  Because that is what confirmation bias is: seeing something which is not true; creating a narrative to make something makes sense which is incongruent with your belief system and personal knowledge/experience; to prevent cognitive dissonance.  To make it make sense.

As Donald Rumsfeld said (this is where you engage your critical thinking):

1. There are (1) known (2) knowns. 

(Where you agree something is fact.  I am a woman. Etc. ( I was an asylum seeker for almost two years.  I lived and worked in Iraq three times.)

2. There are known unknowns. 

(Where you agree you know there are some things which you don’t know.  How nice it is working in Iraq and how extremely hospitable most Kurds are. What a beautiful country it is.  How women are treated in private in Kurdistan.  FGM rates.)

3. There are unknown knowns. 

(Where you agree there are things you know that you can’t know, because you have no way of knowing them, but other people do. For example, what it is like to be a white woman in an asylum camp, in a western country, as the minority, with multiple ethnicities (some very racist) from across the world – who are mostly dark skinned and from non-western cultures. How it is to be a female who has experienced FGM.)

4. There are unknown unknowns.

(Where you agree/accept that you haven’t even thought about some things because they are so far out of your sphere of consciousness, that you cannot even know that you do not know them. Therefore you do not know the questions you need to ask to discover this new information because it has no connection to your current knowledge. This could be a cultural or subcultural habit which you have never experienced in a culture you have never heard of. For example:  The subcultures in asylum camps. Being beaten by deranged African woman in an asylum camps with no laws. The laws of the jungle. (Note:  You will assume this is a racist comment because you assume all asylum seekers are black!)

You may be able to infer some things, but if you completely lack experience in, or zero knowledge of something completely out of your sphere of references (and these assumptions are influenced by your gender, social class, race, educational level, personal preferences and could be intergenerational also); and hold a position of influence in the narratives:  you are completely responsible for causing damage and harm if you assert something which is untrue based on something you know nothing about!

The most that you can say is, factually: ‘I have no idea! I cannot be confident.’ 

People, don’t!  Officials, don’t!  Egotistical people, don't! People who want influence, don’t!  People who are sadistic and power hungry, and who have already made false assertions and told lies, made mistakes, are often the most enthusiastically consistent in continuing to assert lies and falsehoods.  They cannot back down and admit, ‘I made a big mistake!’ They don't want to either!

Before I move on to the way your focus and perspective can trick you.  Let’s do a quick focus test.  Watch this video and count how many times the players wearing white pass the basketball.  Is it 5; 6; 10?  How good is your focus? (click on the link) There are players wearing white and other players wearing black. This is to help you focus your attention.

Five-minute break!

This is how narratives are created, if you realise what you just did and what just happened.  Your focus is diverted to one narrative, and you are asked to comment on that narrative (repeatedly) and explain things about the 'distraction narrative'. You believe what you are saying is the most important aspect of the conversation and will defend your arguments depending on how much you are challenged. (Did you really see 6 passes?  Are you sure it wasn’t ten passes?) This takes your time and attention.  There are only so many hours in the day! 

'Now imagine a whole system promoting one narrative about one person and repeatedly asking hundreds (maybe thousands across continents) of people to 'comment; give an opinion; validate; repeat'. This then infiltrates belief systems and steals your focus.  People are forced to respond; I am forced to respond because I know how to get you to see the truth, I must challenge your assumptions.  This takes time and stops me discussing the real problem: Corruption.  People do not have a lot of time.  Governments deliberately distract you by filling your time and also harassing you.  This then reinforces the narrative.  I have been forced to engage in a narrative which has nothing to do with the reality of my situation. People who are entrenched in certain narratives (UN people; immigration people; observers; lower-level staff; amateur mental health idiots) have had their attention diverted and captured by an ‘official report’!  People have just repeated and repeated without engaging their critical thinking skills or have not had the time to do so.  Even when I am sat right in front of them! Every question they have asked has been based around the wrong narrative. State propaganda towards me!

By the time someone realises their mistake they have become part of the wrong narrative.

Competing narratives

Now look at the competing narratives in this diagram below, and the motives of the three players involved (Me; the Swiss; the British).  The most important things to consider are:  Who has the power; when; what can they do with it and what did they do when they (you) discovered the truth (considered a different narrative)? 

You/they experienced cognitive dissonance.  The same feeling you felt if you took part in the above focus experiment:  You missed the other, huge element which was right in your face!

You/they were misled by the ‘reports’, written by people with motives, cognitive biases, ignorance (‘Unknown uknowns’ which they claimed were knowns, based on their limited past experience.  Commenting on things they know nothing about!) 

This is why the chronology of events is important and why British institutions are deleting official information.  It is easy to be swayed by the first emotionally engaging version of a story you hear, when in fact it may not be true.  The more engaging a narrative is, the more engaged you are!  It could be extremely sadistic; extremely unusual; extremely taboo; or extremely sad.  The FCDO has engaged numerous narratives with different reports at different point to engage different responses from different people in different countries and contexts. At the moment they are going with the 'sad narrative'. It is a false narrative!

They British state (FCDO; Police Scotland; Judge Colin Boyd and other judges) have blatantly lied and tried to end my life: by encouraging other people to attack me in extremely dangerous situations (asylum camps; Iraq) or by making my life so unbearable that I do it myself!

The simple explanation – A Vector.  A Perfect Storm.

Historically this is what happened.

An Iraqi in Iraq made false assertions about me in 2018 whilst I was working in his university deparment (English Dept. Raparin University and also Qualadza University).  Through their embassy in Iraq, the UK FCDO recorded them as fact, knowing they were not, and kept this secret from me.  They pretended the reports I sent them about abusive Kurds (professors and heads of department) in the university were irrelevant. A university which the British and EU were involved in and were engaged in setting up the Bologna System, with the very same men who were abusing me and sexually harassing me, in 2018. (The UK and EU were encouraging this narrative they were promoting because they were putting millions (Raparin University Oct 2018 - Dec 2018) into a system which is inherently extremely misogynistic and corrupt.) Slandering me was their solution to this problem. Other Kurdish women complained about these perverted Kurdish professors. There was also an Irish pedophile working at the university who knew I knew what he was doing because I complained.

The FCDO passed these lies to Police Scotland.  The past false narratives coming from Judge Colin Boyd, originating in 2005, when he covered up for the murder of my son, which Police Scotland have repeated from 2018 to this day, formed a narrative; a vector, a perfect storm.  

I then went to work for a Barzani. I was head hunted!

This situation is so rare, and so out of the consciousness of everyone involved, (except me, because I was at the centre of the storm) that people found explanations because they had no idea that what they were dealing with (to them) was an ‘unknown unknown’, dressed up as a FACT!  People with invested and competing perspectives on MY situation! 

People who could not see the over-arching influences and narratives (corruption involving the UK, EU and US), and who were/are, by the time they did realise something did not make sense, were by that time entrenched, in their own and the false narrative, preferred narrative. They unwittingly became part of the false narrative by repetition and believing it to be true.  Self-preservation then engages; once someone realises they are complicit in the false narrative and persecution:  Cognitive dissonance!

Trying to explain to people who believe they are experts at spotting lies, that they are wrong, using the above explanation and method, is an idea every single professional person I have spoken to refuses to accept.  Very few accept their own fallibility if their career, income and reputation depend on their expertise.  Their reputation. Or if they too are misogynists. Rather than accept women are as equally intelligent as men, maybe more so, they prefer the delusion that women are 'just plain crazy; angry at nothing; argumentative'.

This diagram above is the visual representation of what happened face to face to me in Switzerland and in Swiss Asylum Camps.

The ‘Problems and Options’ in the diagram, are different but overlapping for each actor in my story but if you have been following you can assume some of them.  They changed depending on which country I was in and whether I was asking for asylum the first time (Switzerland), the second time (Croatia) or the third time (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Keir Starmer was the Prime Minister during all of this time.

My Problems and solution:

1. I need to know exactly what the FCDO and British State are saying about me and they are refusing to release unredacted files, and claiming there is no more information. I know this is a lie because they already released what they claim they did not have.

2. Solution: Throw myself into the centre of the storm; force a result quickly rather than wait; collect information surreptitiously from anywhere and everywhere. Invite outside scrutiny (The Swiss; the Chinese; The Croatians; The Bosnians).

Their Problems - FCDO (Police Scotland and IPT Court/Colin Boyd) and The Swiss

1. How do we explain what happened in Ranya and Erbil in Kurdistan Iraq? How do we explain there is no proof Lucy ever saw a psychiatrist in Scotland or Ranya, or had any 'history of psychiatric treatment'? How do we explain contacting a relative she accused of rape and of murdering her son, while she was being harassed by perverted Kurds in Ranya? How do we explain why Lucy was silenced in the US court where she was a first-person witness in Barzani fraud, in 2022?  How do we explain why nobody in Scotland would take her report of serious international crimes involving the Barzanis in 2020? How do we explain that we decided not to invite her to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal she instigated in 2021? How do we explain the false narrative we sent to China and her university employer in 2022? How do we explain the reports sent to the Baghdad Embassy in 2023, when Lucy went to work for the American University of Baghdad in Iraq?  How do we explain multiple breaches of GDPR laws, and Police Scotland stalking her, to China, and Baghdad?  How do we explain getting involved in an asylum request for a British citizen in Switzerland? How do we explain the lies the FCDO told, when Lucy asked for Subject Access Requests, where we pretended we did not have her version of events (emails and reports from me) and therefore the full version of events in other countries, esp. Iraq?  How do we explain the request for Lucy to be tortured in Switzerland, in order to try and force her back to the UK?  How do we explain why kidnapping the passport of someone outside the UK, who has not committed a crime, was/is justified? How do we explain the persecution we enacted on Lucy, in full knowledge we were doing it? How do we explain Judge Colin Boyd’s refusal to investigate or even justify not investigating the murder of Lucy’s child in 2005?  How do we explain the surveillance?  How do we explain the abuse of her human rights? How do we explain the multiple lies told about her mental health, since 2005, when we took the word of her abusive family members that they were:  Her late son’s next of kin?  How do we explain the repeated false assertions that she is known as 'Elizabeth' and not 'Lucy'? How do we look less sadistic, misogynistic and incompetent? How do we explain destroying this woman's life, over a period of 21 years, from 2005, without any justification at all; and how to we justify denying her the proceeds of her efforts against all odds (income; peace; nice retirement outside the UK), without any fault on her part, ever?

   
   

Their solutions

The main solutions for the Swiss and the British are denial; institutional and reputational self-preservation. 

I will be able to prove this if the Swiss immigration and Swiss authorities release ALL the information and judicial decisions.  

The main solution the Swiss and British adopted, aided by many racist misogynists in the asylum camps was:

“We claim she is deranged; dangerous and paranoid! Then, hopefully, we will convince her and other people she has PTSD and will create the scenario we did not have before:  she needs to be ‘controlled’!” This kills two birds with one stone. We do not have to explain anything we have done (under 'problems') and nobody will let her speak 'for her own good'!

Except I escaped!

And now I am in Asia! In order for this narrative to work, the person at the centre of the storm has to be CAPTURED and SILENCED!

The narrative coming from the FCDO has changed so often, and so blatantly, that I am left with the impression I am dealing with very sadistic but complete idiots!  They even sent a British spy to take part in my second immigration interview in Switzerland, who tried to change my official, recorded statement, right in front of the Swiss immigration officer.  That is how desperate they were at that point!  Switzerland has refused to release the interview records.  This is my right as a former asylum seeker.

They have sent reports to countries I am not even in.  They have contacted people who abused my son (in Scotland in 2005; in Ranya in 2018; and in the IPT Court in London, in 2022).  They (I am assuming an FCDO report sent to the City of Edinburgh Council when I was writing my IPT Appeal) have written reports claiming I accused Saqi Barzani of rape. This is to encourage people to treat me as if I am 'traumatised' - except I am not because Saqi Barzani would never do that!

It goes on and on!  And they refuse to release the information, claiming they do not have it. They are weaponizing time so as to be able to legally delete all false information and now when I ask for information they respond in the quickest time I have ever seen – still asserting, ‘You are paranoid.  We did nothing!’  When everyone is dead who knew me as the only responsible parent of my late son, or who knew me in Kurdistan, then my narrative will die also.  As my internet access is limited people in other countries I have lived in cannot see what is happening and therefore cannot confirm what happened in Iraq.

The above diagram is a visual explanation of the competing narratives at play in my situation in Switzerland.  I had been fighting the FCDO; Police Scotland; IPT judges since 2018 (2005), which resulted in me asking for asylum in Switzerland, in 2023, where this ‘perfect storm’ happened. 

The perfect storm was something I deliberately forced because prior to this the FCDO, IPT judges, Police Scotland refused to accept that their lies (false narratives) were causing me extreme damage.  This is the extreme I had to go to to catch perverts and criminals in the FCDO and Police Scotland. Their persecution of me was destroying me, had destroyed my career and they were attempting to force me to live in the UK (where it is easier to harass, stalk and silence my voice); and given they intended to continue on this trajectory (refusal of IPT Appeal in Oct 2023) I took control of the speed of it and forced the end result, by asking for asylum:  The end result which they wanted, which I believe was their intention, was me being forcibly incarcerated and silenced!  

Instead, I became a willing observer in their narratives, and I gathered information via direct (and indirectly) conversations with various Swiss state actors (immigration officers; asylum centre staff; doctors; other asylum seekers in camps who were being given information about me from asylum centre staff and telling me what they were saying; a judge – who ripped up a document intended to silence me).  The British State intention was to incarcerate me – using lies from the FCDO and Iraq and Boyd/Police Scotland.  This failed, so they then asked the Swiss to torture me and I almost died!  

They admitted what their intention was in a letter they sent to me, from the FCDO, at the beginning of 2025, in Croatia, when I was seeking asylum in Croatia.  This latest narrative (she is deranged and the Swiss agree) was the new assertion they made to Croatian and Bosnian immigration officers and lawyers to make people afraid of me and so I would be denied asylum protection.  They claimed they had an ‘official report’ from Switzerland, which was obtained in exactly the same way they started their lies in Ranya, 2018, which claimed I was deranged. A corrupt Iraqi Kurd claimed he had taken a psychiatrist to my apartment when I was in a dispute with them, due to me harming the childish ego of Sallah Xoshnaw, the Head of the English Department. I resigned because of this pervert.

This report from Switzerland, which was my only contact ever with psychiatrists, was to make them (the FCDO; Judge Colin Boyd; Police Scotland) look far less like sadistic, incompetent, misogynistic gangsters who:

silenced the mother of a murdered child and covered up the murder of my child; whilst also silencing me about the corruption they were involved in in Kurdistan.

The truth is, the British state and British police are viciously misogynistic and extremely corrupt. They needed this document to claim: the probability is that, based on Lucy's past history, she is most likely to be absolutely deranged by now, aged 58 and we have every reason to lock her up. The Swiss agree! They have selectively portrayed me as an abused child; who then had alcohol and drug problems; who is angry for no reason; who now has PTSD.

It is complete bullshit! It is an idea with no substance! It ignored multiple facts:

1. I was a campaigner for children's rights in Scotland after I exposed my abusive family, 30 years ago!

2. I set up a youth club and was funded by other charities after my son was murdered.

3. I have never had psychiatric treatment.

4. I very successfuly build a wonderful life and career outside the UK, against all odds, and in spite of what Judge Colin Boyd and his allies did to me.

5. I was very happy in Iraq and had multiple friends.

6. I had a wonderful, luxurious life with loads of foreign travel and had no intention of every returning permanently to the UK.

The problem the FCDO had with this report (which they seemed oblivious to) which they so enthusiastically sent me like a bunch of deranged psychopaths, in Croatia: this Swiss report which was handed in to the British Embassy in Berne, apparently ‘by me’ (I was in Croatia at the time, which official reports will confirm) was destroyed by a Swiss judge, in front of seven witnesses!  The judge also stated officially:  Nothing will come of this report!  Then he ripped it up, dramatically.   The Swiss also refuse to release this judicial decision!  Self-preservation!

My findings.

So, when I was living in asylum camps, what came into sharp focus was the narrative being circulated about me.  My behaviour had not changed.  I was still calm, still very articulate, having spent decades teaching people in different cultures, and still writing multiple well-written documents, by this time for multiple legal systems (Chinese; British; Swiss) because I was repeatedly denied legal assistance, a lawyer.  

I would enter asylum camps (I was moved around about seven or eight times to deliberately prevent me from building relationships) and I was treated as if I was incapacitated.  I was more than able to challenge this assumption but me demonstrating my intellectual abilities was considered threatening to people who have no way of reaching this level of critical thinking.  They felt small, jealous, threatened and defensive.  My calm demeaner, and the fact I was witnessing the abusive attitude of many ORS staff members, meant many exploited this narrative that was being circulated about me. 

This is how it played out at a day to day micro-level - see diagram below.

People, asylum seekers, members of staff in the asylum centres were the least informed and the most captured! They also had their own challenges and living in Swiss asylum camps is designed to be torturous. The Swiss torture asylum seekers, especially the asylum seekers of their allies: Australian; European; American; British. These people were in camps also. Whistle blowers!

Explanation of the above diagram - Perception and blindness!

The outer light pink circle in the above Venn diagram, is my consciousness from my experience, knowledge and awareness that the people I am speaking to are like children (unaware or corrupt). They have never worked in Iraq; lived in asylum camps; probably never had a wonderful international life outside the UK/their own countries; don't know what it is like to be a whistle blower and to have your life destroyed because you are speaking out about global corruption. They do not know what they do not know. This is where I have used my teaching skills, knowledge of psychology and my awareness to observe and gather information when I was an asylum seeker in Switzerland. Also, my knowledge of the fact I knew I was being slandered, and false narratives have been deliberately circulated about me, which by 2023, had already resulted in me losing a job in China (resigned from two universities) and a job in Baghdad (I asked the AUIB to fire me, given they were making false accusations which came from Police Scotland). I knew quite a lot and had seen the damage being done to me, but I needed more information. I got it!

Some examples:

1. Immigration officers contacted by the FCDO and given reports that I 'had had previous psychiatric treatment'. That 'my family' had been contacted and asked for their advice. that I did not raise my children and both my children were dead. Regardless of the fact I was sitting right in front of the immigration officer willing to tell her why I was asking for asylum, she did not read my reasons - which you have to submit before the interview. For nearly three hours she interviewed me about what Police Scotland wanted to interview me about because I had exposed the fact they had never interviewed me in 2005 (in my IPT case in 2022) when my son was murdered.

   The immigration officer could not see me! She had no way of assessing if I was telling the truth or not, because she had a very compelling request from the British State and Police Scotland: "Ask her what happened to her late sons!" This is a very emotive request and something which would compel most people to follow this line of questioning. I revealed nothing new! It was clear to me why she was asked to do that but it was not clear to her! In the second interview the British state sent a spy who tried to change my statement - to the opposite of what I said. (This is recorded in the official statement - as a "change" - and initialled as such. I made sure the correct thing was recorded, after the spy tried to change my words!)

2. ORS Staff - sent vicious reports from Police Scotland claiming I did not raise my children and both my children are dead; and that I had a 'previous psychiatric history'. All false! Most of the ORS staff I met were not European, were sharing all information, esp. information for a British woman with asylum seekers of the same ethnicity or religion (Islamic). Most men from extremely misogynistic background were in agreement with this ideology - women who complain about mistreatment are insane. Most of the men in these camps were happy to abuse me and many would have been happy to rape me. An Arab forced me to sleep in the middle of hundreds of these men, shortly after arriving in the camp, and I believe he hoped that someone would rape me. He was from Iraq, possibly Kurdish. Rape or the threat of rape was being used as a form of torture.

   The false narratives circulated to the camps were intended to encourage men and women to assault me and they did. Many things were said to me by asylum seekers which did not come from me. I gathered evidence. People 'knew' things they should not have known. ORS staff were giving them information. Additionally, the men who hated women and the people who hated white people in these camps, were not interested in the truth or seeing me. They were just bad people! So, this wasn't evidence of 'confirmation bias'. This was evidence of racial hatred and misogyny, being used as a weapon against me. The abuse of confirmation bias to torture me.

3. Psychologists I asked to speak to, to ask them to record the assaults in the camps (psychologists are not allowed in the camps - they are oblivious to what happens and the conditions) read the same reports from the FCDO, from Ranya in Kurdistan. From the abusive Kurds in Raparin University (2018) and from the FCDO. These reports led them to believe or just to conveniently claim: you have PTSD. I was being assaulted in the camps. There was nothing 'POST' about anything. I was never allowed to speak about the camps or the attacks or the abuse happening to many people in the camps - between asylum seekers and from the staff. Psychologist had a vested interest in not letting me speak and not getting to know me and the real story. Not just because healthcare is private in Switzerland and the local hospital made millions from keeping asylum seekers sick. And, I believe they were told: Give us a psych assessment so we can say 'PTSD'. They wanted to try to use this to incarcerate and silence me. They wanted this to divert attention away from the barbarity of denying an investigation of a murdered child and not interviewing the only parent of that child! The FCDO did try this (to claim 'this whole asylum seeking is because she is mental', n Croatia but were too stupid to realise:

   A. The document they were using, which did not say what they claimed it said (they changed the assertions to try to claim I had one of the most serious mental disorders to exist) was ripped up publicly by a Swiss judge. It wasn't only ripped up in front of witnesses but the judge claimed: This will go no further.

   B. They obtained the document illegally which is against Swiss law. They were also repeating the behaviour they demonstrated in 2018 when they did a similar thing: obtained some false document from a psychiatrist who I had never met. A Kurdish Iraqi. Obtaining another 'real document', which they believed was real, admonishes the psychiatrist and Colin Boyd from their previous assertions that: I had had psychiatric treatment, both as a child and in Ranya, Kurdistan. The FCDO needed this document to look less criminal! They are criminals! To try to silence me they convinced other people that I was dangerous and insane. These 'professionals' in Switzerland had zero assessment ability even with me sitting right in front of them. They refused to let me speak. They simply repeated what the FCDO wrote and the evidence of this is online - because I recorded two doctors demonstrating confirmation bias! I recorded one and the second recorded himself and gave me the recordings.

   
   

These exampls should teach you how strong confirmation bias is and how people are psychologically programmed to seek answers to resolve their cognitivie dissonance. Their cognitive dissonance was me sitting in front of them calm, rational, willing to talk and explain and being absolutely NORMAL! The hospital admitted to me, informally, they had made mistakes and explicitly said:

"You are normal. We have also spoken to the FCDO and they said you can safely go back to the UK. Alexandria did not know (that the reports were fake and that Helen Urban is a psychopath/has PTSD)"

Number one, I had no intention of returning to the UK. Number two, nobody should have been speaking to anyone in the FCDO - it is against asylum law, given I had told them I was being stalked, slandered and persecuted by the FCDO and Police Scotland/Colin Boyd. Number three, why did they think that information from the FCDO would be of comfort to me after the lies they had told; and number four, why would they believe that, after coming to the correct conclusion, that I was being stalked, slandered and persecuted, that the FCDO and British state would not continue to do this given I was never going to shut up about their corruption?

The answer: confirmation bias - they believed what the FCDO were saying. Not because my behaviour was odd but because I was 'out of context'. They did not know how to interpret a western woman in a Swiss asylum camp. Additionally, the FCDO did exactly what they had been doing since 2018: got someone to send them a report claiming I was deranged (the report that was ripped up by the Swiss judge).

The FCDO, regardless of their assurances given to the Swiss, continued and continue to slander, stalk and persecute me!

Had I not asked for asylum and not forced the inevitable result of their slander?

Had the false narratives been given the time to play out!

Now, I want you to consider what could have happened to me and could still happen to me if we follow the trajectory of the narratives circulated and if I did not manage to escape Europe!

The trajectory was clear to me in 2020 and it is probably even more certain now, if I was ever to return to Europe or the UK; given people lack awareness and refuse to accept they have become embroiled in corruption! That is how corruption works: people choose to become involved, or they are forced into involvement.

I have been challenging a very corrupt Judge, Colin Boyd; the FCDO; Prime Ministers; Police forces; the involvement in corruption in Kurdistan by the Americans and the British; a very abusive asylum system in Switzerland; and the collusion of two states in torturing me rather than admit to their mistakes. And I will continue to do so until I die! Not because I care about the UK or Switzerland; but to fight because it is the right thing to do.

My son was murdered and the COPFS and Colin Boyd covered it up. I am not a corrupt person in any sense: morally, mentally, intellectually or financially. We were, are good people and we have all been persecuted by a perverted and corrupt British establishment. I believe these perversions and corruption comes from the very top of the British Establishment, and if not, it is a reflection of his inaction to protect innocent British citizens:

Charlie Saxe-Coburg Gotha (Kind Charles of the United Kingdom)

Hence the picture of one of the most barbaric relatives of the British Royal Family: King Henry the VIII

List of documents denied and needed to prove/disprove the above:

1. Full disclosure of asylum interviews recorded by the Swiss immigration officers (Interview 1 and 2 - which are in English and French).

2. Full disclosure of the release decision made by a Swiss judge after a Bangladeshi manager in a Swiss asylum camp tried to have me locked up indefinitiely.

3. Full disclosure of all files from ORS - the organisation that manages and employs asylum seekers across multiple European countries, including Switzerland.

4. Full disclosure of recorded minutes of meetings with a deranged doctor in Friebourg, who repeatedly repeated the lies written about me by the FCDO and Police Scotland, and asylum camp staff. Plus, full disclosure of her mental health history with multiple psychiatrists in France and Switzerland (including the multiple times she was forcibly incarcerated for long periods)- which she told me all about! (Loose lips sink ships!)

5. Full disclosure of the IPT court decision and what their 'investigations' covered and who they spoke to. UREDACTED!

6. Full disclosure of why Colin Boyd refused to investigate the murder of my child.

7. Full disclosure of FCDO, Police Scotland, COPFS and City of Edinburgh Council files UNREDACTED dating back to 2005.

8. Full disclosure of asylum files from Croatia and Bosnia.

9. Full disclosure of the team involved in 'interfering in my current life and the networks; databases; processes implemented based on the dangerous and fake assertions made about me by the Swiss and FCDO/British state. WHO is making decisions about how I am stalked; who can make money out of me; who is limiting my right to live peacefully; who did all of this since 2020?

10. WHO gave the instruction not to release my passport when I left Switzerland, and who gave the instruction not to release it for eight months? Probably Keir Starmer and probably those bureaucrats in the FCDO! At a guess!

Lastly, for those who know nothing about the reasons people give for asking for asylum. Here is one of them:

Temporary protection while an abusive government or tyrannical Prime Minister is in control. This can lead to a longer term request should the regime continue to adopt tyrannical, oppressive and abusive policies intended to harm innocent citizens.

I should have been given asylum protection in Switzerland, or Croatia or Bosnia. Instead I was forced to flee as nobody was listening to me and Croatia were instructed by the British and Swiss to return me to Switzerland, to be tortured again!